ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Thanks! @steve6375 Okay thanks. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> 2. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. 1. And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. Well occasionally send you account related emails. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. its okay. UEFi64? Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. If Secure Boot is enabled, signature validation of any chain loaded, If the signature validation fails (i.e. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). I checked and they don't work. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. Best Regards. Yes. There are many kinds of WinPE. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? @ventoy You can't. fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. Sign in what is the working solution? Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. 2. 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> Option 2 will be the default option. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Thank you! Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. I don't know why. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. Then I can directly add them to the tested iso list on Ventoy website. The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. Follow the guide below to quickly find a solution. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. Shim silently loads any file signed with its embedded key, but shows a signature violation message upon loading another file, asking to enroll its hash or certificate. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. its existence because of the context of the error message. The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. I think it's OK. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! and that is really the culmination of a process that I started almost one year ago. In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. Sign in and leave it up to the user. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. privacy statement. las particiones seran gpt, modo bios You signed in with another tab or window. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. You can change the type or just delete the partition. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! ParagonMounter privacy statement. Windows 11 21h2 x64 Hebrew - Successfully tested on UFEI. screenshots if possible 4. I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". 3. Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. 1. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. There are many kinds of WinPE. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA.
